Google Play & Apple App Store rejection help
App Rejected? We Help You Find the Problem and Prepare for Resubmission.
Rejected, removed, suspended or denied production access? Send us the notice and our technical team tells you the likely cause and the right next step — the initial review is free. If a code, configuration or privacy fix is needed, our developers can implement it, quoted separately.
Get My Free Rejection Review Free initial review · No payment required
- Free initial review — likely cause and next step
- Real technical fixes — not just appeal wording
- Android, iOS, Flutter, React Native and Unity
- Independent of Google and Apple — no guarantees
Backed by Keshav Infotech
Established 2008 · 70+ in-house team · Android · iOS · Flutter · React Native · Unity · backend/API
Not only rejection consultants — our developers inspect and fix the app, backend, SDK configuration, billing, privacy declarations, reviewer access and the production build when required.
Start with your situation
What problem are you facing?
Pick the notice that matches yours. Each guide explains what the wording means, the usual root causes, and whether a fix, a reply or an appeal is the right move.
Production Access Rejected
Policy Violation
Data Safety Rejection
Guideline 2.1 — App Completeness
Guideline 4.3 — Spam / Similar Apps
IAP / Payment Rejection (3.1)
Not listed? See all Google Play guides, all App Store guides, or search the Rejection Library.
How it works
What happens after you send the notice
A rejection notice is a symptom. The process is built to find the cause before anyone drafts a reply — and the first step costs nothing.
-
Step 1: Submit your rejection
Paste the exact notice or attach a screenshot, tell us the platform and stack. Takes a few minutes. Free.
-
Step 2: Technical team reviews it
Engineers map the wording to the actual policy or guideline and work out what would need checking in the app, listing, declarations or SDKs.
-
Step 3: We explain likely cause and next step
You get a plain-English assessment and a clear call: fix, reply to the reviewer, resubmit, or appeal — with the evidence each needs.
-
Step 4: Separate quote if implementation is required
Only if code, configuration, privacy declarations or store settings must change: a scoped quote before any work starts. Never a guaranteed outcome.
The detailed version — scope, costs, what we need and what we will never ask you for — is on how we work. To see the diagnosis itself, read the sample diagnoses.
Start where your problem is
Three common situations. Each one leads to the guidance for that case; the free review is the same review whichever route you take.
-
My app was rejected
A rejection, removal, suspension or refused production access. Start with what the notice actually means on your platform.
-
My update is blocked
Target API level, 16 KB page sizes, Billing Library, signing errors or a developer-verification deadline stopping the release.
-
I need to transfer an app
Moving an app between developer accounts without breaking sign-in, push notifications, subscriptions or payments.
Free initial review
What does my free rejection review include?
A written assessment from our technical team, based on the exact notice and anything you attach. It is free because it is how we scope the work — and it is useful even if you never hire us.
-
Likely rejection cause
What the wording most likely points to — and what it does not.
-
Relevant policy or guideline
The specific Google Play policy or App Store guideline in play, with the official reference.
-
What we would verify
The checks we believe are needed in the app, the listing, the declarations or the reviewer setup.
-
Whether a change is likely required
If an app, configuration, metadata or backend change is probably needed before resubmitting.
-
Fix, reply or appeal recommendation
Which of the three is the sensible path for your case, and what evidence each one needs.
-
Recommended next step
A plain-English next action. If implementation would help, a separate scope and quote.
Initial rejection review is free. Technical implementation, if required, is quoted separately after diagnosis. We never guarantee approval, reinstatement or appeal outcomes — those decisions belong to Google and Apple.
Sample review — example only, not a client case
What a free initial review looks like
An illustrative Apple Guideline 2.1 example written by our team to show the structure. No app, client or result is implied.
Rejection (sample notice)
Guideline 2.1 - Performance - App Completeness We were unable to review your app as it crashed on launch. We have attached detailed crash logs to help troubleshoot this issue. Review device details: - Device type: iPad - OS version: current release Next steps: Please revise your app and test it on a device to ensure it will run as expected.
Likely cause
A launch crash that App Review sees on iPad but the developer does not see on iPhone. The most common triggers in this pattern: the build declares iPad support (device family 1,2) while a launch-time layout or storyboard path assumes iPhone; a first-launch network or SDK initialisation fails without a saved session and an unhandled nil crashes the app; or a Release-only configuration (missing key, stripped resource) differs from the Debug build tested locally. The exact cause is unknown until the attached crash log is read.
What we would verify
- Symbolicate the crash log Apple attached and locate the faulting frame — this settles most of the guesswork.
- Fresh install of the Release build on an iPad (no cached login, no leftover data) and on an iPhone, to reproduce the exact first-launch state App Review uses.
UIDeviceFamily/ “Supports iPad” setting versus the actual layouts and launch storyboard.- Every synchronous call on the launch path: third-party SDK initialisation, remote config, feature flags, backend health checks and how each one behaves when the network or account is missing.
- Whether the backend blocks or times out for App Review’s region or IP range.
Recommended path
Fix, then resubmit — not an appeal. A reproducible crash is a genuine 2.1 issue and an appeal would be declined. After the fix: add a launch smoke test on iPad to the release checklist, resubmit the corrected build and add a short factual note in App Review Information describing what was fixed. An appeal or reply to the reviewer only makes sense if the crash cannot be reproduced on any device and the log points to something outside the app.
In a real review this is written for your notice, your logs and your stack. The free review ends here; if you want us to implement the fix, that work is scoped and quoted separately.
Why this is different
More than an appeal-letter service
Most rejection services stop at explaining the email and drafting an appeal. That helps when the reviewer was wrong. It does nothing when the reviewer was right — which is common.
App Rejection Fix is operated by a development company. When the cause is a crash, a Data safety mismatch, a missing account-deletion flow, a permission an SDK dragged in, a StoreKit or Play Billing problem, or a reviewer who could not get past your login, we can diagnose it and change the app.
What we will not do: fabricate testing evidence, hide functionality from reviewers, create replacement accounts to evade enforcement, or promise an approval. Those shortcuts turn a fixable rejection into a terminated account.
| Capability | Typical appeal service | App Rejection Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Explain the rejection notice | Yes | Yes |
| Map wording to the actual policy / guideline | Sometimes | Yes, with the official source cited |
| Audit SDKs, permissions, data flows and declarations | No | Yes |
| Implement code / configuration fixes (Android, iOS, Flutter, React Native, Unity, backend) | No | Yes |
| Fix reviewer access, IAP / billing and account deletion flows | No | Yes |
| Resubmission checklist and QA on release build | No | Yes |
| Appeal drafting when the decision is genuinely wrong | Yes | Yes, evidence-based |
| “Guaranteed” outcomes | Often claimed | Never — no one outside the platform can promise an outcome |
Google Play rejection help
From production-access denials and “more testing required” to policy violations, suspensions, Data safety mismatches and reviewer-access failures.
Production Access Rejected
More Testing Required
Policy Violation
App Suspended
Developer Account Terminated
Data Safety Rejection
Reviewer / App Access Rejection
Google Play Submission Checklist
Sensitive Permissions & Declarations
App Content Declarations
Apple App Store rejection help
Guideline 2.1, 2.3, 3.1, 4.2, 4.3 and 5.1 rejections explained — and when to fix, reply, resubmit or appeal.
App Store Rejection Reasons
Guideline 2.1 — App Completeness
Guideline 4.2 — Minimum Functionality
Guideline 4.3 — Spam / Similar Apps
Privacy Rejection (5.1)
App Store Appeal
Metadata Rejection (2.3)
IAP / Payment Rejection (3.1)
App Store Expedited Review
App Store Submission Checklist
In-App Purchases Not Working
Not a rejection, still blocked?
More publishing problems we help solve
Google Play and App Store increasingly stop releases for technical reasons that no appeal can fix: an old target API level, a deprecated Billing Library, unaligned native libraries, a build not made with Xcode 26, an unregistered package or a lost signing key. The same engineers who diagnose rejections fix these.
Legacy App Update & Modernization
Target API Level 36 Fix
16 KB Page Size Fix
Play Billing Library 8 Upgrade
Android Developer Verification
Sensitive Permissions & Declarations
In-App Purchases Not Working
Google Play App Transfer
Also: App Store app transfer · iOS code signing · lost keystore or upload key · expedited review · publishing deadlines. The free initial review covers publishing blockers exactly like rejections.
Not submitted yet?
Free tool: Android update readiness checker
More testing required?
If Google says your closed test was not enough, the fix is rarely “run the same 14 days again”. We look at what the test showed, how the application was answered and whether the app itself is ready. Only when a case genuinely needs another qualifying test do we point you to managed testing.
Read the More Testing Required guide →Who is behind this
Why trust App Rejection Fix?
A real development company
Grounded in the actual policies
Honest about outcomes
Independent
What we see most
Common rejection scenarios we review
Published case studies are added only with the client’s written permission. Until then, these are the scenarios that arrive most often — described from the taxonomy, with no invented outcomes.
Production access rejected
Data safety rejection
Reviewer / app access
App suspended
Guideline 2.1 — App Completeness
Guideline 4.2 — Minimum Functionality
Guideline 4.3 — Spam / Similar apps
Guideline 5.1.1 — Data Collection and Storage
To see how one of these is actually taken apart, read the five sample diagnoses — worked examples, not customer stories. Real, permissioned case studies are published on the same page as completed engagements allow.
Free tool · automated preliminary guidance
Rejection Decoder
Paste your notice and see the likely platform, enforcement type, policy or guideline, plain-English explanation, possible causes and the recommended next step — with a confidence level. Deterministic, private, no account needed.
Try Free Rejection DecoderThe Decoder is preliminary automated guidance; the free human review is where an engineer verifies it.
// example output
platform: Apple App Store
guideline: 4.3 — Spam
category: Similar / template apps
technical review: likely
confidence: High
next step: differentiate or consolidate before appealing
Questions
Frequently asked questions
What does App Rejection Fix actually do?
We read your rejection, removal or suspension notice, identify the most likely root cause, and tell you honestly whether the problem is a policy interpretation issue, a metadata issue, or a technical defect in the app, its backend, its SDKs or its store configuration.
Because we are a development company, we can then implement legitimate fixes — code, configuration, privacy declarations, reviewer access, StoreKit or Play Billing — and prepare the app for resubmission or a well-founded appeal.
Related: Submit Rejection, About
Do you guarantee approval, reinstatement or a successful appeal?
No. Nobody outside Google or Apple can guarantee a review outcome, and any service that does is misleading you. What we can do is find the real problem, fix what is legitimately fixable, remove avoidable reasons for a repeat rejection and present your case accurately. That materially improves your position, but the decision always belongs to the platform.
Related: Disclaimer
What should I send you first?
The exact rejection text, copied word for word, plus screenshots of the notice if you have them. Tell us the platform, the app name, the technology stack and whether this is a first rejection or a repeat. Do not send passwords, signing keys, API secrets, recovery codes or payment credentials — we never need them for an initial review and we will ask you to remove them if they are included.
Related: Submit Rejection
Apple cited a guideline number. What does it mean?
The number maps to a section of the App Store Review Guidelines. 2.1 is App Completeness (crashes, bugs, incomplete features, reviewer access), 2.3 is Accurate Metadata, 3.1 is Payments and In-App Purchase, 4.2 is Minimum Functionality, 4.3 is Spam and similar apps, and 5.1 is Privacy. The number tells you the category; the reviewer's message and any attached screenshot tell you the specific trigger. Both matter.
Related: App Store Rejection Reasons, App Store Rejection Help
Can you actually change the app, or only advise?
Both. Keshav Infotech has in-house Android, iOS, Flutter, React Native, Unity, web and backend engineers plus QA. Typical rejection-driven work includes fixing crashes, implementing account deletion, aligning Data safety or App Privacy declarations with real data flows, adding privacy manifests, correcting permission usage, rebuilding purchase flows on StoreKit or Play Billing, and making reviewer access work.
Related: About, Submit Rejection
Send us the rejection. We’ll tell you what it likely means.
The free initial review is how we scope the work — you will know the likely cause and the recommended path before any development is proposed.
What happens next: an engineer on our technical team reads the notice you send — not an autoresponder. We work out what it most likely means and what we would check, and reply with that assessment and a recommended next step.
Initial rejection review is free. Technical implementation, if required, is quoted separately.
Free initial review · No payment required · No source code required initially