App Rejection Fix
Apple App Store

Why Did Apple Reject Your App? Common App Store Rejection Reasons Explained

Most App Store rejections come from a short list of causes. This page explains each one in plain English, shows which guideline it usually maps to, and tells you whether the right response is a fix, a reply, a resubmission or an appeal. If your message quotes a guideline number, the table at the end takes you straight to the detailed guide.

Free initial review · No payment required · No source code required initially

On this page (14 sections)

Crashes and bugs

The reviewer launched the app on a current device and OS and hit a crash, freeze, blank screen or a broken flow. Apple attaches crash logs or screenshots when it can. Reproduce on the same device class and OS with the release build, not a debug build, and check that your backend and third-party services were reachable at review time. Guideline: 2.1.

Reviewer access

No demo account, credentials that expired, a code the reviewer cannot receive, or features gated by region, hardware or a paid plan. Provide a durable demo account and step-by-step notes in App Review Information. Guideline: 2.1 (sometimes phrased as “Information Needed”).

Metadata problems

Screenshots that show a different app or platform, claims the app cannot back up, names or subtitles with keywords stuffed in, previews that are not captured from the app, wrong age rating, references to other platforms or to pricing. Fixable in App Store Connect, usually with the same build. Guideline: 2.3.

Minimum functionality

The app is judged too limited: a wrapped website, a brochure, a set of links or content that does not need an app. Cosmetic changes rarely resolve this. Guideline: 4.2.

Spam and duplicate apps

Too similar to your other apps or to existing apps, built from a purchased template, or one of many near-identical apps in a saturated category. Multiple bundle IDs or developer accounts do not fix similarity. Guideline: 4.3.

Privacy

Missing or unreachable privacy policy, vague permission purpose strings, data collected without need, tracking without App Tracking Transparency consent, no account deletion, App Privacy labels that disagree with the app, or missing privacy manifests for required-reason APIs. Guideline: 5.1 (and privacy manifest requirements).

Payments and in-app purchase

Digital content or features unlocked outside In-App Purchase, subscription terms not disclosed, restore purchases missing, IAP items that do not load for the reviewer, or external purchase links that are not permitted for your storefront. Guideline: 3.1 and its sub-sections.

Login and account issues

Requiring an account for features that do not need one, offering only third-party login without an equivalent privacy-preserving option, or account creation without deletion. Guidelines: 5.1.1, 4.8, 5.1.1(v).

Hidden or misleading functionality

Features that behave differently for reviewers, remote switches that change the app after approval, undocumented or dormant code paths, or a description that promises something else. This is treated seriously and can affect the account. Guideline: 2.3.1 and related.

User-generated content and safety

Apps with user content need filtering, reporting, blocking and a way to contact the developer; some categories need age gating or moderation evidence. Guideline: 1.2.

Message wording → likely category

Typical App Review phrases and the category they indicate
If the message says… Likely category Guideline Detailed guide
“exhibited one or more bugs” / “crashed on launch” Completeness 2.1 Guideline 2.1
“we were unable to sign in” / “demo account” Reviewer access 2.1 Guideline 2.1
“we need additional information” / “Information Needed” Reviewer question 2.1 Guideline 2.1
“screenshots do not reflect the app” / “metadata” Metadata 2.3 Metadata rejection
“not sufficiently different from a mobile browsing experience” Minimum functionality 4.2 Guideline 4.2
“similar to other apps” / “spam” / “saturated” Spam / duplicates 4.3 Guideline 4.3
“unlock features or functionality” / “in-app purchase” Payments 3.1.1 IAP / payment rejection
“purpose string” / “privacy policy” / “collects data” Privacy 5.1.1 Privacy rejection
“tracks users” / “App Tracking Transparency” Data use and sharing 5.1.2 Privacy rejection
“account deletion” Privacy 5.1.1(v) Privacy rejection
“hidden or undocumented features” Hidden functionality 2.3.1 Metadata rejection

Fix, reply, resubmit or appeal — by category

Recommended response by rejection category
Category Fix Reply Resubmit same build Appeal
Crashes / bugs Yes Rarely No Only if you can show it does not crash on the cited device
Reviewer access Provide working access Yes, with new credentials Often No
Metadata Correct the listing If the reviewer misread it Usually Rarely
Minimum functionality Add real functionality or reconsider If real functionality was missed No Only with concrete evidence of functionality
Spam / duplicates Differentiate or consolidate With a comparison No With a concrete comparison
Privacy Yes If the finding is factually wrong No Rarely
Payments Yes If the exception genuinely applies No When the exception applies and was rejected

Prevention checklist

  • Test the release build on the newest iPhone and iPad OS versions before submitting
  • Provide a durable demo account and complete review notes
  • Screenshots and previews captured from the actual build; description matches features
  • Privacy policy reachable in the app and the listing; App Privacy labels and privacy manifests accurate
  • Every purchase of digital content goes through In-App Purchase unless an exception clearly applies
  • Account creation paired with in-app account deletion
  • No feature flags that change behaviour after review

Where we fit in

Most App Store rejections map to a technical or product change rather than a better reply. We identify which category your message really belongs to, reproduce the reviewer’s finding on the cited device and OS, and implement the change — crash fixes, reviewer access and demo accounts, StoreKit configuration, privacy manifests and purpose strings, metadata alignment — on iOS native, Flutter, React Native and Unity apps. The initial review of your notice is free. Apple’s decision remains Apple’s: we do not guarantee approval and we do not write around a guideline you have not met.

Want the category for your specific message?

Paste it into the Rejection Decoder for an instant reading, or send it to us for a human review with a concrete recommendation.

What happens next: an engineer on our technical team reads the notice you send — not an autoresponder. We work out what it most likely means and what we would check, and reply with that assessment and a recommended next step.

Initial rejection review is free. Technical implementation, if required, is quoted separately.

Get My Free Rejection Review

Free initial review · No payment required · No source code required initially